<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personalized Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scriblio.net/scribbles/145/personalized-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scriblio.net/scribbles/145/personalized-search/</link>
	<description>open source software for libraries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: calebtr</title>
		<link>http://scriblio.net/scribbles/145/personalized-search/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>calebtr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libdev.plymouth.edu/post/30#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>re: opac applications, and not completely on-topic, i think it&#039;s long overdue that we (try to) use search data to help out our relevancy rankings in keyword searches, except instead of tracking each individual&#039;s personalized searches, track the community of people who search.

privacy-wise, an anonymous session cookie could record the search and rate success based on what records were viewed (some points), how many records were viewed for that session-search (a search is less helpful if you have to look at lots of records), and whether or not the link to place a hold was followed from any record (lots of points).

later on, the next searcher benefits.

librarians can even seed rankings (call it cataloging).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: opac applications, and not completely on-topic, i think it&#8217;s long overdue that we (try to) use search data to help out our relevancy rankings in keyword searches, except instead of tracking each individual&#8217;s personalized searches, track the community of people who search.</p>
<p>privacy-wise, an anonymous session cookie could record the search and rate success based on what records were viewed (some points), how many records were viewed for that session-search (a search is less helpful if you have to look at lots of records), and whether or not the link to place a hold was followed from any record (lots of points).</p>
<p>later on, the next searcher benefits.</p>
<p>librarians can even seed rankings (call it cataloging).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
